Friday, September 16, 2011

A Leftist View of 9-11 - part 2


“Youth ages. Immaturity is outgrown. Ignorance can be educated, drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.” Aristophanes, 5th Century B.C.

Krugman’s piece (see Part 1) drew a lot of fire Monday and Tuesday…and Donald Rumsfeld publicly cancelled his NYT subscription describing Krugman’s piece as “repugnant.” I would have thought he had cancelled his subscription years ago.

The picture of Krugman with President Bush is a bit of a surprise, given the amount vitriol President Bush has endured from the man over the years. Krugman is a short man…about 5’7”. That old Randy Newman song is playing in my head about now.

Jousting recently with my 1965 Highlander Facebook former “friend” provided one useful thing…a window into the world he uses for his sources of “information.” It’s a collection of linked blogs and websites, possibly managed by many of the same people, most of them pretending to offer erudite opinions, but generally copying one another and stumbling over their own pretense. One only needs to read a couple of paragraphs to recognize the repetitive drivel.

It’s likely that these sites are feeding the growing outrage that tends to boil over on our streets in violent ways, for vague reasons. If you know why these gangs of vandals do what they do, you’re ahead of me. Anarchists, I think they call themselves. They do some damage, get their skulls cracked, are arrested and hauled away. When they’re done about all I’ve seen is the results of stupidity and bad behavior. Maybe that’s the point.

Anyway, if you are like me…relatively ignorant of aims of the far left, yet somewhat troubled by your ignorance…read on in Part 3.



Adios

A Leftist View of 9-11 Part 1

This Paul Krugman op-ed appeared in Sunday’s New York Times. It speaks for itself.

Of interest is that Krugman declined to permit any comments from others. I don’t recall seeing this done before.
Generally, I'm willing to add almost anyone as a Facebook "friend" as long as we have some kind of common connection or our paths crossed at sometime in our lives. I have yet to "unfriend" anyone in the Facebook space, but I have been "unfriended" by 2 former Highlanders I never knew at EH all those years ago. One was a 1961 and the other, a 1965.

Leftist politics was at the root of both events. Apparently neither of my former “friends” had the fortitude to deal with the fact that I am a conservative who is unwilling to sit quietly and accept leftist propaganda as gospel, as Mr. Krugman’s “no comments” decision seems to illustrate. One “friend” took exception to my occasional inclusion of a piece in the blog that reflected my conservative nature. After one (of several) particularly snarky message from him strongly suggesting that I not use “our” Highlander blog for any political content, I felt compelled to remind him that the blog is mine to do with as I wish. Others are welcome to contribute to it or take what they wish from it, or just ignore it. I’m ambivalent about it’s acceptance, although I’m flattered if you like it.

Furthermore, I thought it useful to remind him that I didn’t know him 50-years ago at EH where he was a moderately visible elder Highlander, nor do I know him now.

The other former Facebook friend is apparently an unbridled leftist who kept feeding me a steady flow of so-called “news” stories taken from a collection of leftist websites he frequents. I or anyone was invited to comment on his posts. However, it was quickly evident that neither he, nor his other leftist friends wanted to debate anything rationally. The invective-filled flurry of retorts to pretty much anything I posted clearly illustrated an intolerant far left dogma existed there, rather than a rational debate. However, it was sometimes fun to pitch a bone in just to see the resulting frenzy—they were that predictable. Of course, as most Texas boys can attest, even zapping ants with a magnifying glass out on the walk can only hold one’s interest just so long.

My 1965 Highlander former “friend” pitched one of his stink bombs out on Facebook a couple of days ago and apparently left his computer for the day, leaving 4 of his weakest “activists” behind to carry on the “discussion.” All they could muster was a string of invectives calling me about every nasty thing they could pull from their limited vocabularies. Not once did they address the issue, so intent were they in hurling their silly invectives. I don't think I've encountered such low and childish communication since Jr. Hi. Perhaps, not even there as I was a big kid who the smaller ones generally wouldn't provoke.

Now, for a large part of my professional career I was the principal wordsmith for a medium-size company, charged with communicating with my peers at many of the largest corporations in the world. In that role, I learned to be careful about what I wrote and if I were angry, to put those responses off until tomorrow in order to see if I still felt as strongly about the matter then as I did at the time. More often than not, I didn't, so I saved myself from some potentially embarrassing attention to ill-chosen words. And angry people can sometimes become solid friends later on.

Hope this piece hasn’t rambled too much…there is more to say that I will put into a couple of follow-on posts.

Continued in Part 2

Adios

Sunday, July 31, 2011

Theater of the Absurd

Yesterday's headlines reflected a common theme regarding the budget circus going on in Washington. The mashup tells the story better than I could.

Am I mistaken, or were these jobs once held by adults? Peggy Noonan, one of my favorite writers had one of the more amusing quotes of the day....do you know what "fop sweat" is? I got the ferret thing. And Nancy is trying to save the world as we know it...I'm so proud of her.

Adios

Monday, June 13, 2011

Palin – She Is What She Is

After spending a lot of money, crowdsourcing, and finding that Sarah is what she appears to be…a hard working Conservative hiding nothing, it takes a UK news outlet to publish this weekend’s email witch hunt results.

I’m not a fan of clichés and try not to use them, but I do like the current, “it is what it is” cliché. It’s succinct and so often true.


Adios

Sunday, June 12, 2011

Crowdsourcing – Vote Sarah!



A new buzzword entered my sphere this weekend—crowdsource. It’s another of those non-word words introduced into our daily discourse by younger, tech-centered members of our society. In past decades, their youthful exuberance and immaturity has been moderated by older generations of adults applying “adult supervision” which appears to be utterly absent today.

In what appears a Leftist-driven obsession with a private citizen who might mount a campaign for President in the next election cycle, writers from a number of large newspapers issued a call for public assistance to comb through over 24,000 pages of emails related to Sarah Palin’s time as Governor of Alaska.

Sometimes, when I see a particularly ridiculous or repugnant piece of writing offered under the banner of what we once considered “mainstream” media, I like to find a picture of the author just to see who is trying to influence my thinking…these days I think that’s important. The news articles shown nearby show small pictures of the authors along with the headlines.

“Crowdsourcing” is somewhat related to how new software is released in “beta” form for the public to try out and report problems. Although the approach is counter to how I was brought up—to take responsibility and do it right the first time—today it is a broadly accepted method used to solicit and obtain free labor to accomplish a complex task. If people are foolish or twisted enough to contribute their time to silly enterprises, that is their business.

Sarah Palin obviously triggers convulsions in Leftists. For that reason alone, I’m for her and if she and Michelle want to TEAM up, I'm for it. Vote Sarah…if she decides to run!

Adios

P.S. What an entertaining weekend--Weiner & emails.

Wednesday, June 8, 2011

A Breath of Fresh Air - A Teachable Moment

The ditty was "God Save the Queen" Britain's national anthem, not "America" as a background melody to a particularly dulcet toast. Listen carefully as Queen Elizabeth turns slightly to offer some advice after he finishes ('set it down"). At nearly the same moment, note his head toss as a finishing flourish. Emily Post, Letitia Baldridge, and Miss Manners have been showing the way on etiquette in these matters for nearly a century...but someone must read the books first in order to learn.

Queen Elizabeth and her family have been at these functions for many years...centuries, actually. If you are interested in learning more about her and her family, there have been 3 very well-done films made within the past few years: The Queen; Elizabeth; and Elizabeth the Golden Age.

She has been fulfilling her part in the long history of England all her significant life. One way of looking at this flub is that it's true that what goes around, comes around. As one of his first acts in office he shipped the bronze bust of Churchill back to England and replaced with Martin Luther King. That was his prerogative, of course, but it struck many people as being in poor taste. Wonder if the Queen had a private chuckle? I would imagine so.

God Save the Queen

Friday, January 21, 2011

18 Worst Email Mistakes


, On Tuesday January 18, 2011, 2:10 pm EST

Most of us rely on e-mail as one of our primary communication tools. And given the number of messages we send and receive, we do it with remarkable success.

But as with anything, the more e-mails we send, the more likely we are to screw one up. And simple e-mail mistakes can be disastrous. They can cost us a raise, promotion--even a job.

With a new year upon us, this is the perfect time to go through some of the worst e-mail mistakes employees make and how to avoid them.

1. Sending before you mean to. Enter the recipient's e-mail address only when your e-mail is ready to be sent. This helps reduce the risk of an embarrassing misfire, such as sending an important e-mail to the wrong person or e-mailing a half-written note.

2. Forgetting the attachment. If your e-mail includes an attachment, upload the file to the e-mail before composing it. This eliminates the embarrassing mistake of forgetting it before hitting "send," and having to send another e-mail saying you forgot to attach the document.

3. Expecting an instant response. Don't send an e-mail and show up at the recipient's desk 30 seconds later asking if they've received it. They did, and they'll answer at their convenience. That's the point of e-mail.

4. Forwarding useless e-mails. I've never seen a single e-mail forward at work that was beneficial. Whether it's a silly joke or a heartwarming charity, there's never a time to share an e-mail forward using your work e-mail.

5. Not reviewing all new messages before replying. When you return to the office after a week or more away, review all new e-mails before firing off responses. It might be hard to accept, but odds are, things did march on without you. Replying to something that was already handled by a co-worker creates extra communication, which can lead to confusion, errors, and at the very least, wasted time for everyone involved.

6. Omitting recipients when you "reply all." Unless there's an important reason to omit someone, don't arbitrarily leave people off the response if they were included on the original message.

7. Including your e-mail signature again and again. Nor do you need to include it at the end of an e-mail you send to your long-time co-worker who sits six feet away. If you have your e-mail program set to automatically generate a signature with each new message, take a second to delete it when communicating with someone who knows who you are. It's always wise to include your phone number, but the entire blurb with your title and mailing address is often nothing but clutter.

8. Composing the note too quickly. Don't be careless; write every e-mail as if it will be read at Saint Peter's Square during the blessing of a new Pope. Be respectful with your words and take pride in every communication.

9. Violating your company's e-mail policy. Many companies have aggressive spam filters in place that monitor "blue" language. From that famous four-letter word to simple terms, such as "job search," don't end up tripping the system by letting your guard down.

10. Failing to include basic greetings. Simple pleasantries do the trick. Say "hi" at the start of the message and "thanks" at the end. Be sure to use the recipient's name. Be polite yet brief with your courtesy.

11. E-mailing when you're angry. Don't do it. Ever. Recall buttons are far from a perfect science, and sending a business e-mail tainted by emotion is often a catastrophic mistake. It sounds cliche, but sleep on it. Save the message as a draft and see if you still want to send it the next morning.

12. Underestimating the importance of the subject line. The subject line is your headline. Make it interesting, and you'll increase the odds of getting the recipient's attention. Our inboxes are cluttered; you need to be creative and direct to help the recipient cut through the noise. You should consistently use meaningful and descriptive subject lines. This will help your colleagues determine what you're writing about and build your "inbox street cred," which means important messages are more likely to be read.

13. Using incorrect subject lines. Change the subject line if you're changing the topic of conversation. Better yet, start a new e-mail thread.

14. Sending the wrong attachment. If you double-check an attachment immediately before sending and decide that you need to make changes, don't forget to update the source file. Making corrections to the version that's attached to the e-mail does not often work, and it can lead to different versions of the same doc floating around.

15. Not putting an e-mail in context. Even if you were talking to someone an hour ago about something, remind them in the e-mail why you're writing. In this multi-tasking world of ours, it's easy for even the sharpest minds to forget what's going on.

16. Using BCC too often. Use BCC (blind carbon copy) sparingly. Even though it's supposed to be a secret, it rarely is. Burn someone once, and they'll never trust you again. Likewise, forwarding e-mail is a great way to destroy your credibility. When people send you something, they aren't expecting you to pass it on to your co-workers. The e-mail might make its way back to the sender, who will see that their original message was shared. They might not call you out on it, but they'll make a mental note that you can't be trusted.

17. Relying too much on e-mail. News flash! No one is sitting around staring at their inbox waiting for your e-mail. If something is urgent, use another means of communication. A red "rush" exclamation point doesn't compare to getting up from your desk and conducting business in person.

18. Hitting "reply all" unintentionally. This is a biggie. And it's not just embarrassing; depending on what you wrote in that e-mail, it can ruin your relationship with a co-worker or even your boss. Take extra care whenever you respond so you don't hit this fatal button.

Now it's time to fess up: Are you guilty of any of these common work e-mail mistakes? Any you'd like to add to the list?